| Home |Breishith |Shmot |Vayikra |BaMidbar |Dvarim |Holidays |Tehillim |Stories |
| Yom Ha'Atzma'ut: Rav Kook and Zionism |
During controversy over the Hetter Mechirah in 1910, Rabbi
Yaakov David Wilovsky (the 'Ridbaz') of Safed leveled a serious
accusation. He accused Rav Kook of abandoning his religious
beliefs and becoming a Zionist in his old age. (In fact, from a very early age
Rav Kook was imbued with a great love for Eretz Yisrael.)
For an Orthodox rabbi to support a secular movement that publicly
proclaimed that it 'has nothing to do with theology' was close to heresy.
Why should a religious scholar with a deep love for all peoples be supportive
of a secular nationalist movement? Indeed, Rav Kook's outlook on Zionism
is a complex topic, the subject of numerous books and academic articles,
and certainly beyond the scope of a brief essay. Nonetheless, the following
excerpts from his writings and letters shed light on his views on this nonreligious
(and sometimes anti-religious) movement.
Historical Precedents
Rav Kook noted that our generation is not the first to experience a return
to the land of Israel comprised primarily of Jews lax in religious observance.
When Ezra led the return to Eretz Yisrael in the beginning of the Second
Temple Period, many of the Jewish pioneers who joined him were Sabbath-desecrators
and worse; and yet this period witnessed the rebuilding of the
Temple and tremendous advances in Torah scholarship.
Centuries later, during the corrupt reign of Herod, the nation suffered
from a cruel king, far removed from the ideal Jewish leader. The irony of the
holy Temple built by Herod, a brutal and paranoid despot, is even greater
than the current phenomenon of the Holy Land being resettled by secular
pioneers. The actual construction, Rav Kook wrote, "may be carried by those
who fail to penetrate the profound secrets of the righteous. And not just the
stonemasons; they may even be the ones orchestrating the construction." Yet
this does not sully the innate purity of the lofty objective.
The Positive Influence of Eretz Yisrael
Rav Kook suggested that we need not be overly concerned about the
religious level of the pioneers, since the Land on its own will determine who
is deserving of living in it.
Furthermore, the merit of Eretz Yisrael helps even the unworthy:
Sacred Roots
Despite the current secular nature of Zionism, the return to Eretz Yisrael
in recent times was first promoted by great tzaddikim — starting with the
disciples of the Gaon of Vilna and the Baal Shem Tov — and Zionism derives
its spiritual nourishment from these holy roots.
Breaking of the Vessels
For Rav Kook, the fall of Zionism into the hands of the secularists was a
form of shevirat keilim, reminiscent of the Kabbalistic 'breaking of vessels'
that occurred when the universe was created. The original light and holiness
was simply too great to be contained within the limitations of the physical
vessels; and it is our task to return these fallen sparks to their elevated source.
But why did the return to the land of Israel need to be appropriated by
a secular nationalist movement? Rav Kook attempted to solve this riddle by
noting certain qualities lacking in religious circles:
Additionally, Rav Kook explained that the pre-Messianic era requires a
more practical, down-to-earth orientation, so that the Jewish people may
return to their land as a healthy, balanced nation, after centuries of detached
statelessness in exile.
However, secular Zionism can only bring about the material rebuilding
of the Jewish people in their homeland. The nation's complete renewal will
only come about when Zionism is restored to its original holiness.
True Zionism
And what about the Ridbaz's accusations that Rav Kook had descended
to heresy, becoming a secular Zionist? Rav Kook responded that Zionism,
when based on its true ideals, is nothing to be ashamed of:
To summarize the salient points in Rav Kook's views on Zionism:
(Silver from the Land of Israel, pp. 175-180.
Based on letters from Igrot HaRe'iyah vol. I, pp. 56, 88, 207–208 (1907);
vol. I, p. 448 (1910); vol. II, pp. 171–172, 194–195 (1913); vol. III, pp. 157–158 (1918).)
Copyright © 2010 by Chanan Morrison
"There is no need to check the level
of kashrut of those who come, for the
Land will vomit out the true chaff; and "all those remaining shall be called
holy" (Isaiah 4:3). This is similar to how we do not separate food from its
waste elements before we eat it, but leave this [separation] process to life's
natural functions."
"The merit of the Land even protects the wicked. Even a gentile maidservant
in the land of Israel is promised a portion in the World to Come (Ketubot
111a). Clearly the Talmud is not speaking of a righteous maidservant, who
would anyway merit the World to Come... Rather it is referring to an
ordinary maidservant, with sordid deeds and coarse traits. Nonetheless,
the merit of living in the land of Israel enables her to gain a portion in the
World to Come....
"All the more so [regarding the secular Zionists, since] one may find
in every Jew, even the most unworthy, precious gems of good deeds and
positive traits. Certainly the land of Israel helps elevate and sanctify them.
And if this is not evident in them, it will become so in their descendants."
"[It was] the lofty righteous of previous generations who ignited a holy
inner fire, a burning love for the holiness of Eretz Yisrael in the hearts of
God's people. Due to their efforts, individuals gathered in the desolate
land, until significant areas became a garden of Eden, and a large and
important community of the entire people of Israel has settled in our holy
land....
"Recently, however, the pious and great scholars have gradually abandoned
the enterprise of settling the Holy Land.... This holy work has
been appropriated by those lacking in [Torah] knowledge and good deeds....
Nonetheless, we see that the [secularists'] dedication in deed and action
is nourished from the initial efforts of true tzaddikim, who kindled the
holy desire to rebuild the Holy Land and return our exiles there."
"The fundamental moral force hidden in [the Zionist movement] ... is its
motto, 'the entire nation.' This nationalism proclaims... that it seeks to
redeem the entire Jewish people. It does not concern itself with individuals
or parties or sectors.... And with this perspective, it reaches out to the
land of Israel and the love of Zion with a remarkable bravery and courage.
"It is clear that we cannot confront this adversary if we lack the same
noble sense of responsibility that speaks in the name of the entire nation,
all of Israel. We may not distinguish and divide. We may not say, 'This
one is one of ours so we will take care of him, but not that one.' ... [We
must] care in our hearts and souls for the good of the entire nation and its
redemption, in the most inclusive way possible."
"We have a tradition [see Sotah 49b] that there will be a spiritual revolt of the Jewish
people in Eretz Yisrael during the initial period of national revival.... The
aspirations for lofty and holy ideals will cease and the nation's spirit will
sink.... The necessity for this revolt will be the tendency for materialism,
which must be powerfully generated in the entire nation after the passage
of so many years in which the need and availability of material pursuits
were completely absent. When born, this proclivity will trample angrily
and stir up storms; these are the birth pangs of the Messianic era."
(Orot HaTechiyah sec. 44, p. 84)
"Secular nationalism may be defiled with much defilement, concealing
many evil spirits. But we will not succeed by trying to expel this movement
from the nation's soul. Rather we must energetically return it to its
elevated source and combine it with the original holiness from which it
emanates." (Orot HaTechiyah sec. 22, p. 75)
"My dear friend! If all Zionists would love the land of Israel and seek the
settlement of the Holy Land for the same reason and holy goal that I have
in mind — because it is God's land, special and beloved out of the entire
world, containing unique holy qualities that foster prophesy and Divine
inspiration... then it would be certainly a great honor for every important
rabbi and Torah scholar and tzaddik to be such a Zionist. Even your honor
should find nothing objectionable in this form of Zionism."
.
