| Home |Breishith |Shmot |Vayikra |BaMidbar |Dvarim |Holidays |Tehillim |Stories |
| Vayeshev: Joseph's Labors in Exile |
Perhaps our greatest question in life is: do our actions
have true significance? The performance of mitzvot is
metaphysically meaningful, but what about our day-to-day
activities? Ultimately, how much of our lives and pursuits
truly matter?
39 Types of Melachah
The Mishnah (Shabbat 7:2) enumerates 39 categories of
melachah, activities that are not permitted on the
Sabbath, such as planting, cooking, and building. Is there
something special about the number 39? The Talmud in Shabbat
49b presents two possibilities. The first opinion is that
39 types of work were performed when constructing the Mishkan
(Tabernacle) in the desert. And the second opinion is that the
word melachah (in its various forms) appears 39 times in
the Torah.
In fact, the word melachah appears 65 times, but the Sages
were only counting verses that somehow relate to Shabbat or
the Tabernacle. Thus we find that the Talmud was
not sure which verses should be included in this count of
39. One of the verses in question, from the reading of
VaYeshev, speaks of Joseph's labor for his Egyptian
master, Potiphar: "And he came to the house to do his work"
(Gen. 39:11).
Why should this verse be counted? Surely it has no
connection to the Sabbath!
What Belongs to the Realm of Shabbat?
We must first understand these two views presented in the
Talmud, connecting the 39 categories of activity either to
the building of the Mishkan or to the word melachah in
the Torah.
The Sabbath day of rest is in total contrast to the days of
activity and work. The Sabbath belongs to the final goal of
the universe, a time when all activity is finished. Work, by
definition, indicates a state of incompleteness. Shabbat, on
the other hand, is "mei'ein olam haba," a taste of the
future world, perfected and complete.
We live in an unfinished world of preparations and laboring,
of development and progression. The Tabernacle was a center
of holiness within a spatial framework, subject to
the limitations of our incomplete world. The Divine command
to construct a Tabernacle required that all the various
categories of human activity be utilized in building it. The
Jewish people needed to overcome and master the temporal obstacles that
obstruct elevated life; then they could attain their ultimate
objectives, holiness in living and closeness to God.
The second opinion quoted in the Talmud comes from a
loftier perspective. The distinction between kodesh and
chol, between the holy and the profane, only exists within
our incomplete and divided reality. But when all of the
forces and actions in the world are gathered together
towards one elevated center, when all of life is directed to
fulfill its true purpose, then the distinction between holy
and profane disappears, and all aspects of life are bound together
in one elevated union of "kodesh
kodashim," the Holy of Holies.
When we view the world through this higher prospective,
adding the dimension of "kodesh kodashim," then all activities
become connected to the Sabbath ideal. All of life is related
to the sublime aim of absolute
rest, without toil and preparations, only enlightened joy and eternal value.
The view that sees in every mention of melachah in the
Torah as relating to Shabbat is not satisfied with ascribing
meaning and significance only to the kodesh, only to those
activities utilized to build the Mishkan. This is a
inclusive vision that encompasses the holy and the profane,
the natural and technological. Bound together, all activities are
sanctified with the holiness of the Sabbath day and the
future Sabbath realm. Not only is the holy center raised up,
but also the branches, all of the forms of activity
and melachah as recorded in the Torah.
In short, these two opinions deliberate our original question.
The Talmudic discussion of what may be counted as the source for the
melachot is, in fact, our question of how much
of life truly 'counts'. Are only holy activities truly
meaningful? Or is there eternal significance even in other aspects
of life?
Labor for Alien Goals
According to the second, more inclusive view, the Sabbath
encompasses all activities of the Jewish people, both past and
future, personal and national. However, the Jewish people
in their long history have expended much time and energy in
dispersed directions. Many Jews used their best
talents in serving alien agendas. This is the essence of
the Talmud's doubt regarding Joseph's labors in Egypt. Can
individual activities performed in foreign
lands for foreign goals still be counted as part of
the accumulated service of the Jewish people over the
millennia? Do they have eternal value?
On the one hand, it cannot be that the labors of a Jew will
not carry the residual imprint of the Jewish nation. Even if it was
'planted' on foreign soil, that which is suitable can be
added, after removing the dregs, to the treasury of elevated
Sabbath rest that Israel will bequest to itself and all of
humanity.
On the other hand, labor that was performed under foreign
subjugation and enslavement is perhaps so removed from the
spirit of the Jewish people that it cannot be added to the
national treasure of Israel.
Joseph's Labors under Potiphar
Joseph, the Midrash states, represents the entire Jewish
people (Tanchuma VaYigash 10). Even when laboring in Egypt,
even as a slave under Potiphar and in the jail, his actions
carried the mark of blessing and Divine success. "His master
realized that God was with him, and that God granted him
success in all that he did" (39:3). "God blessed the
Egyptian because of Joseph" (39:5).
Nonetheless, we should not forget Potiphar's position: chief
executioner under Pharaoh. The activities that Joseph
performed under Potiphar's direction were certainly alien to
the spirit of Israel. Could the inner blessing of Joseph's
labors under such conditions be added to the
treasury of activities connected to the perfected realm of Shabbat? This was the
unresolved doubt of the Talmudic scholars, whether to include the
verse describing Joseph's labors in a strange land.
(adapted from Ein Eyah vol. III pp. 7-9)
Copyright © 2006 by Chanan Morrison
