| Home |Breishith |Shmot |Vayikra |BaMidbar |Dvarim |Holidays |Tehillim |Stories |
| Tzav: The Prohibition of Cheilev |
Some commentaries (Maimonides, Guide, III:48;
Sefer HaChinuch, mitzvah 147)
explain that the Torah prohibits eating these fats for health
reasons. Yet, if this were true, why is only the cheilev of
these three animals forbidden?
Curiously, we find that the mitzvah of kisuy ha-dam, covering
the blood after slaughtering, only applies to non-domesticated
animals and fowl. Why does the Torah not require kisuy ha-dam
also for cattle, sheep, and goats? Why do these two mitzvot, both
of which pertain to the preparation of kosher meat, apply to two
mutually exclusive groups of animals?
Domesticated and Wild Animals
If we analyze the degree of sensitivity one should have when
taking the life of an animal for food, we should differentiate
between two categories of animals. The first category consists of
animals that we do not feed and raise. These are wild animals
that are hunted and killed. All birds are included in this
category, as they usually need to be trapped. [Of course, this
was more applicable in the days when chickens and other poultry
were allowed to roam freely, not cooped up in small cages.]
We
should feel embarrassment when we must stoop to such ignoble and
cruel behavior. Therefore, when stalking and killing untamed
animals and birds, the Torah commands us to cover the blood, a
sign of our inner shame at this merciless act. "If any man...
traps a wild animal or bird that may be eaten and sheds its
blood, he must cover the blood with earth" (Lev. 17:13).
The second category of animals is comprised of domesticated
beasts: cattle, sheep, and goats. We raise and feed them for
their milk, wool, and labor. Not to kill these animals for food
after they approach old age and are much less productive,
requires a higher and more refined sense of ethical sensitivity.
Regarding this category of animals, who become a burden to their
owner in old age, the Torah does not require that their blood be
covered after their slaughter. We need not feel the same extent
of embarrassment as when taking the life of a wild animal.
Nonetheless, the Torah created for domesticated animals a special
prohibition to remind us that we should only take their lives for
our essential needs. This is the purpose of the prohibition of
cheilev. We are permitted to slaughter these animals for their
meat, to give us energy and strength, but they should not be
killed for the sake of their fats. We should not kill them merely
for the pleasure of eating their fatty meat, so pleasurable to
the palate of the gastronome. The prohibition of cheilev
emphasizes that we should only take their lives out of genuine
necessity.
Why does the Torah not prohibit eating the fats of birds and wild
animals? We should feel ashamed at this cruel act, regardless of
whether our intent is for pure enjoyment or true need. If the
Torah distinguished between their meat and their fats, this would
only obscure the moral impact of covering their blood, a sign of
our profound embarrassment over spilling the blood of a free
animal, no matter what the circumstances.
(Gold from the Land of Israel. Adapted from Otzarot HaRe'iyah
vol. II, p. 95)
Copyright © 2006 by Chanan Morrison
"Do not eat any of the hard
fat (cheilev) in an ox, sheep, or
goat." (Lev. 7:23)
