| Home |Breishith |Shmot |Vayikra |BaMidbar |Dvarim |Holidays |Tehillim |Stories |
| Chukat: The Book of God's Wars |
The Torah reading concludes with an obscure reference to the "Book of God's
Wars," describing the Arnon canyon near the border between the Land
of Israel and Moab. The verses are cryptic, and the Talmud
(Berachot 54a-b) fills in the details with the following story:
Just before the Israelites were to enter the Land of Israel, the
Amorites (one of the Canaanite nations) laid a trap for them. They
chipped away at the rock, creating hiding places along a narrow
pass in the Arnon canyon. There the Amorite soldiers hid, waiting
for the Israelites to pass through, when they could attack them
with great advantage.
What the Amorites didn't know was that the Holy Ark would smooth
the way for the Jewish people in their travels through the desert.
When the Ark arrived at the Arnon Pass, the mountains on each side
crushed together, killing the Amorite soldiers. The Israelites
traveled through the pass, blissfully unaware of their deliverance.
But at the end of the Jewish camp were two lepers, named Et and
Vehav. The last ones to cross through, it was they who noticed the
riverbed turned crimson from the crushed enemy soldiers. They
realized that a miracle had taken place, and reported it to the
rest of the Israelites. The entire nation sang a song of thanks, namely,
the poetic verses that the Torah quotes from the "Book of God's
Wars."
Challenges to the Torah
The Talmud clearly understands that this was a historical event,
and even prescribes a blessing to be recited upon seeing the Arnon
Pass. Rav Kook, however, interpreted the story in an allegorical
fashion. What are "God's Wars"? These are the ideological battles
of the Torah against paganism and other nefarious views. Sometimes
the battle is out in the open, a clear conflict between opposing
cultures and lifestyles. And sometimes the danger lurks in
crevices, waiting for the opportune moment to emerge and attack the
foundations of the Torah.
Often it is precisely those who are on the fringes, like the lepers
at the edge of the camp, who are most aware of the philosophical
and ideological battles that the Torah wages. These two lepers
represent two types of conflict between the Torah and foreign
cultures. And the Holy Ark, containing the two stone tablets from
Sinai, is a metaphor for the Torah itself.
The names of the two lepers were Et and Vahav. What do these
peculiar names mean?
The word Et in Hebrew is an auxiliary word, with no meaning of
its own. However, it contains the first and last letters of the
word emet, 'truth.' Et represents those challenges that stem from
new ideas in science and knowledge. Et is related
to absolute truth; but without the middle letter, it is only auxiliary
to the truth, lacking its substance.
The word Vahav comes from the work ahava, meaning 'love' (its Hebrew
letters have the same numerical value). The mixing up of the
letters indicates that this an uncontrolled form of love and
passion. Vahav represents the struggle between the Torah and
wild, unbridled living, the contest between instant gratification
and eternal values.
When these two adversaries — new scientific viewpoints (Et) and
unrestrained hedonism (Vahav) — come together, we find ourselves
trapped with no escape, like the Israelites in the Arnon Pass. Only
the light of the Torah (as represented by the Ark) can illuminate
the way, crushing the mountains together and defeating the hidden
foes. These enemies may be unnoticed by those immersed in the inner
sanctum of Torah. But those at the edge, whose connection to Torah
and the Jewish people is tenuous and superficial, are acutely aware
of these struggles, and more likely to witness the victory of the
Torah.
The crushing of the hidden adversaries by the Ark, as the
Israelites entered into the Land of Israel in the time of Moses, is
a sign for the future victory of the Torah over its ideological and
cultural adversaries in the time of the return to Zion in our days.
(Gold from the Land of Israel, pp. 266-267; adapted from Ein Eyah vol. II, p. 246)
Copyright © 2006 by Chanan Morrison
